如何评价聚美优品股东炮轰陈欧?陈欧回应聚美优品股东炮轰说街电融资失败的

时隔近四年,聚美优品在合股生效后,再次提出私有化提议,引发业界热议。1月12日,聚美优品发布公告称,该公司董事会收到公司创始人陈欧为首的买方团的私有化要约,计划以20美元/ADS的......

如何评价聚美优品股东炮轰陈欧

8月的最后一天,聚美优品宣布已完成对深圳街电科技的收购。对聚美优品董事长陈欧来说,却有点高兴不起来。近日,有股东指责称,聚美已经停止有意义的股东交流22个月,有9个月没有给股东披露......接下来具体说说陈欧回应聚美优品股东炮轰说街电融资失败的

陈欧回应聚美优品股东炮轰:说街电融资失败的,回头给你看账户

如何评价聚美优品股东炮轰陈欧?陈欧回应聚美优品股东炮轰说街电融资失败的

聚美优品CEO陈欧因股东一封公开信被推上风口浪尖。

8月29日,聚美优品股东Heng Ren Partners发表一封致聚美优品董事长和红杉资本中国基金管理和执行合伙人沈南鹏的公开信。

公开信称,聚美已经 停止有意义的股东交流22个月,并且有9个月没有给股东披露过公司任何财务信息 。而陈欧在位期间, 聚美市值损失3.97亿美元 ,目前公司的市值仅为4.79亿美元。

信中还提到,陈欧提出的每股7.00美元的“私有化”交易提议大大低估了公司的价值,其随后导致的一系列错误已经使中国线上化妆品零售业领军者的股票下跌了45.2%。

公开信同时指出,聚美并没有兑现诺言,将2014年在美国IPO筹集的2.8亿美元中的资金投资于核心业务的市场营销、品牌推广与产品开发, 反而将超过5,900万美元(相当于聚美市值的12%和账面现金的18%)的资金投资在了值得怀疑的非核心业务上

这些非核心业务包括: 投资1,430万美元用于电视剧的制作;向一家手机移动充电电源初创公司投资4,480万美元

信中提到的“向一家手机移动充电电源初创公司投资4,480万美元”,指的就是今年上半年被炒得轰轰烈烈的共享充电宝品牌: 街电。

据了解,在投资街电以后,陈欧成了街电董事长。

公开信发后,8月31日,聚美优品正式宣布:

聚美优品已经完成对深圳街电科技的收购。聚美优品的全资子公司River International Holding将持有街电科技的股份。

面对指责,陈欧在微博中做出了回应。

陈欧表示,街电的股东并非聚美而是其个人,说街电融资失败的,“回头给你看账户”。

以下为陈欧回应截图。

聚美低价私有化遭炮轰,小股东怒向SEC投诉:面对流氓,就要干他

如何评价聚美优品股东炮轰陈欧?陈欧回应聚美优品股东炮轰说街电融资失败的

时隔近四年,聚美优品在合股生效后,再次提出私有化提议,引发业界热议。

1月12日,聚美优品发布 公告 称,该公司董事会收到公司创始人陈欧为首的买方团的私有化要约,计划以20美元/ADS的价格收购买方团尚未持有的股票。 上述交易完成之后,聚美优品将成为陈欧所有的私有公司,公司的美国存托凭证将会从纽约证券交易所退市。

据悉,聚美优品曾于2016年2月收到来自陈欧等递交的私有化提议,计划以每股美国存托凭证(ADS)7美元的价格收购聚美优品股票。虽然这一价格比聚美前十天均价高出27%,但不及发行价的三分之一,且此后私有化价格又被下调至3美元/ADS,上述私有化提议遭到聚美中小股东的强烈排斥。

而如今,聚美 计划以20美元/ADS引起了 中小投资者的众怒:聚美的股价从*高点至今跌幅超过90%,现在私有化的价格实际上比上次还低了不少,再次刷新底线,无异于是抢钱。

今日,雪球用户@陈达美股投资 在雪球 app 内发帖:受小股东之托,将投资者给SEC的投诉信翻译了一下,希望中小股东利益能得到保护。原文如下

请SEC停止纽交所上市中国公司JMEI的超低价私有化行动

尊敬的SEC管理层

我是一名来自中国的美股小投资者

JMEI公司CEO陈欧先生于2020年1月12日发起对JMEI的每股20美元的私有化要约

我简单介绍一下JMEI现在的情况

1. 按JMEI最后一次财报

2. 聚美在2017年投资了共享充电宝

3. 聚美在2019年4月左右投资短视频网站

以上三块总价值超过10亿美元

另外

1

2

3

陈欧先生在2016年2月发起过靠前次私有化

JMEI是开曼群岛注册公司

1

2

如果陈欧先生拥有以上权力

JMEI虽然不是美国公司

陈欧先生在中国的媒体上一直是以

美国股市管理严格

基于以上两点原因

我恳请尊敬SEC监管层阁下采取两个行动

1. 在规则之内发函JMEI并表达 关注

2. 持续 关注 如果JMEI私有化失败后陈欧先生可能采取的一系列做低股价的行为

绝大部分JMEI小股东将辛苦劳动的储蓄买进JMEI股票

公平与正义是上帝给世人的礼物

中国人有句话

我只会简单的英语

人间还有不义

翻译

SEC, please investigate and stop the ultra-low-price tender offer from management in attempt to buy out Jumei International Holding Ltd (NYSE: JMEI ), a Chinese company listed on the NYSE, to protect the legitimate interests of the minority shareholders

Dear SEC:

I am an investor from China who are particularly interested in investing US-listed stocks. I have many shares in a Chinese Internet company called Jumei International Holding Ltd (JMEI) which is currently listed on the New York Stock Exchange. Now most of individual shareholders who invested in this company are currently in a desperate situation. Our legitimate investment will be severely harmed in a long-planned robbery of an ultra-low-price for privatization of the company.

On January 12, 2020, Mr. Chen Ou, CEO of JMEI, sent out a non-binding $ 20 per share tender offer to privatize JMEI. As individual investors, we were stunned and couldn't believe it!

Let me briefly introduce the current situation of JMEI:

1. According to JMEI's last-filed financial report (2018 annual report), JMEI's net assets (book value of equity) per share now exceed $40.

2. JMEI invested in the power bank rental (for users to charge their cellphones with a fee) company called "JIEDIAN" in 2017. The investment achieved a net profit of more than 10 million US dollars in 2018, and it has taken 40% of the market share for the whole power bank rental market in China, and it has 200 million membership users. In December 2019, another company of equivalent size as JIEDIAN, just completed Series C financing, and they successfully financed 70 million US dollars, which gives them a valuation of more than 500 million US dollars. JMEI has not disclosed JIEDIAN's 2019 operating profile, but a reasonable valuation will not be less than 500 million US dollars. JMEI holds nearly 100% of JIEDIAN's shares.

3. JMEI also invested in a short-form mobile videos company (like TikTok) "SHUABAO" around April 2019. The total downloads of the APP in China exceeded 30 0 million. The specific valuation is unclear and it may likely exceed hundreds of millions of dollars. SHUABAO operates under the name of an independent company, but the investment comes from JMEI. CEO Mr. Chen Ou has confirmed at the latest shareholders' meeting.

Therefore, the total value of the company is more than 1 billion USD, an equivalent to more than $100 per share. Mr. Chen Ou is trying to privatize it at $20 per share! I don't think this is an act for the benefits of the shareholders, and I think this is a pure robbery!

In addition, what is even more unacceptable is that Mr. Chen Ou might commit fraud during the privatization process:

1. On January 10, 2020, JMEI completed the 10-to-1 reverse split . The original price was $ 2 per share, which became $ 20 after the merger of shares. The company

2. On December 25, 2019, he held a Christmas shareholders meeting, verbally promised shareholders not to privatize the company, but instead to work hard to increase the company's actual stock price.

3. JMEI did not release quarterly, semi-annual and full-year reports for FY 2019, and there was no formal communication with the shareholders, resulting in the fall of stock price all the way down to about $2.

4. Mr. Chen Ou initiated the first privatization attempt in February 2016. The price of the privatization was US $ 70 per share (at that time $7 per share), but because the offer was too low, the privatization failed. Since then, JMEI no longer provided quarterly, semi-annual reports. There is a reason to believe that Mr. Chen Ou is intentionally manipulating the stock price, to get it lower.

JMEI is a company registered in the Cayman Islands. I later learned that companies in the Cayman Islands are extremely beneficial to majority shareholders. They have almost unlimited powers. I would like to know from the SEC regulators

1. If JMEI can privatize a company at half the price of its net assets, can he theoretically privatize a company for just $1 dollar or even less?

2. Are the above behaviors taken by Mr. Chen Ou during the privatization process suspected of misleading investors?

If Mr. Chen Ou has the above powers and ability, does it conflict with the "sacred and inviolable personal legal property" stipulated in U.S. law? If Mr. Chen Ou can still exercise his power in spite of the conflict, will he break any U.S. laws and regulations?

Although neither JMEI is a U.S. company nor am I a U.S. citizen, the stock is listed on NYSE, which is technically U.S. territory. Based on the "fairness and justice" principle shared by human civilization, can the SEC express its concern based on morality and legality? Imagine if Mr. Chen Ou completed the robbery, will there be more Cayman Islands companies to follow suit, then how many U.S. stock investors will suffer, and will the stock market in U.S. also become a jungle world?

Mr. Chen Ou has always app eared in the Chinese media as an "inspirational leader" and an "idol of young people". He graduated from Stanford and is a true elite. He has personally endorsed the company

The US stock market is strictly managed and the system is nearly perfect. In my opinion, this is one of the fairest and most equitable stock markets in the world.

Based on the above two reasons, I and other individual shareholders chose to invest in JMEI's stock. But the privatization has completely destroyed our hope. As individual shareholders, we are currently in despair. Mr. Chen Ou and JMEI has by far outpowered us in terms of money, power and resources, (when I wrote this letter, I felt great fear, because the complaint letter may cause Mr. Chen Ou to threaten small shareholders in terms of personal safety), I feel like a child wearing boxing gloves and being forced to compete with the world boxing champion Mike Tyson, and I hope SEC can stop this unfair game.

We are making our humble requests to SEC Regulators to take two actions:

1. To send a letter to JMEI within the rules and express concerns that the JMEI privatization process will be suspended until it is properly negotiated by both parties; and continue to pay attention to a series of actions that Mr. Chen Ou may take to lower the stock price if JMEI's privatization fails;

2. The vast majority of JMEI minority shareholders invest in JMEI with hard-working savings, hoping to pay back children

Fairness and justice are God

The Chinese have a saying: People are doing things, and God is watching. How I wish it is, Mr. Chen Ou is doing something, and the SEC is watching!

I can only speak simple English, so I wrote this letter in Chinese and asked a friend to translate it into English. I hope that the translation can accurately express itself.

股东炮轰聚美优品乱投资,陈欧赶紧做了回应

8月的最后一天,聚美优品宣布已完成对深圳街电科技的收购。对聚美优品董事长陈欧来说,却有点高兴不起来。

近日,有股东指责称,聚美已经停止有意义的股东交流22个月,有9个月没有给股东披露过公司任何财务信息。

恒润投资:聚美让股东“盲飞”

如何评价聚美优品股东炮轰陈欧?陈欧回应聚美优品股东炮轰说街电融资失败的

作为一家共享充电宝公司,街电科技已在超20个主要城市部署充电宝设备。今年5月,聚美优品宣布以3亿元收购街电科技60%的股权。

陈欧的入主让街电的创始团队出现动荡,原CEO王哲出局,由阿里影业前高管原源接任。

如何评价聚美优品股东炮轰陈欧?陈欧回应聚美优品股东炮轰说街电融资失败的

然而,就在一切看起来都尘埃落定的时候,这起投资却引发了聚美优品股东恒润投资的不满。在一封发给聚美优品董事长陈欧和大股东红杉资本中国基金管理和执行合伙人沈南鹏的公开信里,恒润投资指责聚美优品让股东处在“盲飞”状态。

恒润投资声称,聚美没有兑现诺言,将IPO筹集的资金投资于核心业务的市场营销、品牌推广与产品开发,反而将超过5900万美元的资金投到了电视剧制作和共享充电宝上。

除此之外,恒润投资还提到了陈欧1年前提及的私有化计划。聚美优品宣布以每ADS7美元的价格回收,这一价格相当于发行价的三分之一。恒润投资认为这一提议大大低估了公司的价值,并导致了公司股价的下跌。

陈欧:投资街电是为了流量

如何评价聚美优品股东炮轰陈欧?陈欧回应聚美优品股东炮轰说街电融资失败的

对于恒润投资的指责,陈欧公开回应称,信中提及自己已经有22个月没和股东交流这一点不实,事实上公司与管理层沟通频繁。

对于被质疑的投资街电科技等项目,陈欧称,“有质疑聚美投资影视和街电是不务正业。事实上,都是为了流量,流量向超级APP聚集,越来越贵。通过成本更低廉的方式获取流量,是一个企业运营逻辑。”

关于公司账面现金及分红问题,陈欧称,“我们选择了让公司持有现金,巩固和加强聚美的市场份额,开拓可以帮助公司发展的新兴领域。聚美是我全身心投入的事业,相信我比任何人都希望这个公司发展得更好。”

以上就是如何评价聚美优品股东炮轰陈欧?陈欧回应聚美优品股东炮轰说街电融资失败的的详细内容,希望通过阅读小编的文章之后能够有所收获!

版权:本文由用户自行上传,观点仅代表作者本人,本站仅供存储服务。如有侵权,请联系管理员删除,了解详情>>

发布
问题